4.8 Article

Modeling biological and genetic diversity in upper tract urothelial carcinoma with patient derived xenografts

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15885-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sidney Kimmel Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers
  2. Thompson Family Foundation
  3. Cycle for Survival [P50 CA221745, R01 CA234361, R01 CA229624-01, U54 OD020355, P01 CA221757-01A1]
  4. Kaufthal Family Bladder Cancer Fund
  5. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]
  6. Puma Biotechnology
  7. Daiichi-Sankio

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Treatment paradigms for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are typically extrapolated from studies of bladder cancer despite their distinct clinical and molecular characteristics. The advancement of UTUC research is hampered by the lack of disease-specific models. Here, we report the establishment of patient derived xenograft (PDX) and cell line models that reflect the genomic and biological heterogeneity of the human disease. Models demonstrate high genomic concordance with the corresponding patient tumors, with invasive tumors more likely to successfully engraft. Treatment of PDX models with chemotherapy recapitulates responses observed in patients. Analysis of a HER2 S310F-mutant PDX suggests that an antibody drug conjugate targeting HER2 would have superior efficacy versus selective HER2 kinase inhibitors. In sum, the biological and phenotypic concordance between patient and PDXs suggest that these models could facilitate studies of intrinsic and acquired resistance and the development of personalized medicine strategies for UTUC patients. The advancement of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) research is hampered by the lack of disease-specific models. Here, the authors report patient derived xenograft and cell line models of UTUC, and show that these models retain the genomic and biological heterogeneity of human disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available