4.8 Article

Loss of MBNL1 induces RNA misprocessing in the thymus and peripheral blood

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15962-x

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health [NIH NS058901, NS098819]
  2. Muscular Dystrophy Association [MDA546770, MDA480539]
  3. University of Florida McKnight Brain Institute
  4. Polish National Science Centre [2017/24/C/NZ1/00112]
  5. Myotonic Dystrophy Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thymus is a primary lymphoid organ that plays an essential role in T lymphocyte maturation and selection during development of one arm of the mammalian adaptive immune response. Although transcriptional mechanisms have been well documented in thymocyte development, co-/post-transcriptional modifications are also important but have received less attention. Here we demonstrate that the RNA alternative splicing factor MBNL1, which is sequestered in nuclear RNA foci by C(C)UG microsatellite expansions in myotonic dystrophy (DM), is essential for normal thymus development and function. Mbnl1 129S1 knockout mice develop postnatal thymic hyperplasia with thymocyte accumulation. Transcriptome analysis indicates numerous gene expression and RNA mis-splicing events, including transcription factors from the TCF/LEF family. CNBP, the gene containing an intronic CCTG microsatellite expansion in DM type 2 (DM2), is coordinately expressed with MBNL1 in the developing thymus and DM2 CCTG expansions induce similar transcriptome alterations in DM2 blood, which thus serve as disease-specific biomarkers. The activity of the RNA splicing factor MBNL1 is altered in myotonic dystrophy (DM) patients. Here the authors characterize the thymic phenotype of Mbnl1 knockout mice, including developmental defects, transcriptome changes, and RNA mis-splicing of transcripts encoding thymic transcription factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available