Journal
CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 17-33Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/camh.12389
Keywords
Loneliness; interventions; adolescents; children; review; meta-analysis; adolescents
Categories
Funding
- University of Central Lancashire
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Interventions targeting youth have been found to reduce loneliness, but current interventions mainly focus on at-risk youth, with less attention to those reporting loneliness themselves and lacking indication of chronic or transient loneliness. Future work should design specific interventions for loneliness, with universal programs helping youth manage transient feelings of loneliness and targeted interventions for those experiencing chronic loneliness. Additionally, there is a need to explore socioeconomic and other risk factors outside the individual for targeted interventions.
Background Loneliness is common among youth and is associated with poor physical and mental health, and poor educational outcomes. To date, there have been no meta-analyses of interventions aimed at reducing loneliness among young people. Methods We conducted meta-analyses of single group and randomised control trials (RCTs) of studies published between 1980 and 2019, which measured loneliness as an outcome in youth ages 25 years or younger. Moderators, including sample demographics and intervention characteristics, that might affect intervention success, were examined. Results A total of 39 studies (14 single group and 25 RCTs) were included, and we found evidence that youth loneliness could be reduced via intervention. Moderator analysis - including intervention characteristics, study quality and sample demographics - was also examined. Conclusions While interventions were shown to reduce loneliness among youth, the interventions included in the meta-analyses often targeted youth viewed to be at risk - for example those with health concerns - and rarely did the interventions target youth who reported loneliness. There is also no indication of whether youth experienced chronic or transient loneliness. In future work, interventions should be designed specifically for loneliness, with universal programmes helping youth manage their transient feelings of loneliness, and targeted interventions for those suffering from chronic loneliness. There is also a need to look at socioeconomic and other risk factors outside the individual for targeted interventions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available