4.4 Article

Geology and paleontology of the Upper Cretaceous Kem Kem Group of eastern Morocco

Journal

ZOOKEYS
Volume -, Issue 928, Pages 1-216

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.928.47517

Keywords

Africa; Cretaceous; dinosaur; Gara Sbaa Formation; Douira Formation; paleoenvironment; vertebrate

Categories

Funding

  1. National Geographic Society
  2. University of Portsmouth
  3. Museum national d'Histoire naturelle
  4. National Science Foundation
  5. Packard Foundation
  6. Women's Board of the University of Chicago
  7. University College Dublin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The geological and paleoenvironmental setting and the vertebrate taxonomy of the fossiliferous, Cenomanian-age deltaic sediments in eastern Morocco, generally referred to as the Kem Kem beds, are reviewed. These strata are recognized here as the Kem Kem Group, which is composed of the lower Gara Sbaa and upper Douira formations. Both formations have yielded a similar fossil vertebrate assemblage of predominantly isolated elements pertaining to cartilaginous and bony fishes, turtles, crocodyliforms, pterosaurs, and dinosaurs, as well as invertebrate, plant, and trace fossils. These fossils, now in collections around the world, are reviewed and tabulated. The Kem Kem vertebrate fauna is biased toward large-bodied carnivores including at least four large-bodied non-avian theropods (an abelisaurid, Spinosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, and Deltadromeus), several large-bodied pterosaurs, and several large crocodyliforms. No comparable modern terrestrial ecosystem exists with similar bias toward large-bodied carnivores. The Kem Kem vertebrate assemblage, currently the best documented association just prior to the onset of the Cenomanian-Turonian marine transgression, captures the taxonomic diversity of a widespread northern African fauna better than any other contemporary assemblage from elsewhere in Africa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available