4.6 Article

Oxygen transfer and wide-plant energy assessment of primary screening in WRRFs

Journal

WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages 677-692

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/wer.1349

Keywords

activated sludge; aeration; primary screening energy; wastewater

Funding

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (CRD Project) [488704-15]
  2. United States Department of Energy (CERC-WET)
  3. Trojan Technologies
  4. Water-Energy Nexus Center at the University of California, Irvine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary screening can significantly improve oxygen transfer efficiency, with improvements of 27% at pilot scale and 20% at full scale. By integrating changes in oxygen transfer efficiency and carbon redirection, the impact of primary screening on facility energy balance can be explored. Through wide-plant assessment of different scenarios, primary screening can improve energy balance up to 15%, providing insight into the advantages and limitations of energetic sustainability.
Primary screening is gaining interest as a method to achieve removal performances comparable to primary clarification while reducing the footprint and increasing operational elasticity. Aeration efficiency indicators in a pilot sequential batch reactor (SBR) and a full scale water resource recovery facility (WRRF) were investigated after the implementation of rotating belt filters/screens (RBF). To compare the impact between screened (350 mu m) and nonscreened primary influent, two identical treatment lines were monitored using off-gas and respirometric measurements. The study provides the first result on improved oxygen transfer efficiency due to primary screening. Consistent aeration efficiency improvements of 27% and 20% between screened and nonscreened were obtained at pilot and full scale, respectively. Changes in aeration efficiency and carbon redirection were integrated into a set of models to investigate the primary screening impact on the WRRF energy balance. While the wide-plant assessment for different scenarios improved the energy balance up to 15%, a detailed comparative analysis between various treatment schemes gained insight into the advantages and limitations of the energetic sustainability of primary screening. Practitioner points Aeration efficiency improved 27% at pilot scale Aeration efficiency improved 20% at full scale. Use of primary screening can improve the energy balance up to 15 Assessment of advantages and limitations of primary screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available