4.5 Article

DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY AS A NON-INVASIVE BIOMARKER OF HIGH-RISK NON-ALCOHOLIC STEATOHEPATITIS IN PATIENTS WITH NON-ALCOHOLIC FATTY LIVER DISEASE

Journal

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 972-980

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.12.020

Keywords

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; High-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; Shear wave elastography; Liver biopsy

Funding

  1. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health [K23 EB020710, R01 DK119860]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [K23 EB020710, R01 DK119860]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography (SWE) for differentiating high-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (hrNASH) from non-alcoholic fatty liver and low-risk non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease scheduled for liver biopsy underwent prebiopsy SWE. Ten SWE measurements were obtained. Biopsy samples were reviewed using the NASH Clinical Research Network Scoring System and patients with hrNASH were identified. Receiver operating characteristic curves for SWE-based hrNASH diagnosis were charted. One hundred sixteen adult patients underwent liver biopsy at our institution for the evaluation of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SWE for hrNASH diagnosis was 0.73 (95% confidence interval: 0.61-0.84, p < 0.001). The Youden index-based optimal stiffness cutoff value for hrNASH diagnosis was calculated as 8.4 kPa (1.67 m/s), with a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 66%. SWE may be useful for the detection of NASH patients at risk of long-term liver-specific morbidity and mortality. (E-mail: asamir@mgh.harvard.edu) (C) 2020 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available