4.7 Review

Miniaturised air sampling techniques for analysis of volatile organic compounds in air

Journal

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115873

Keywords

Miniaturised air sampling; Volatile organic compounds; Air analysis; Active sampling; Passive sampling; Needle trap microextraction; In-tube extraction; Sorption trap; Solid-phase microextraction; Thin-film microextraction

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201508330310]
  2. Academy of Finland Centre of Excellence program [307331]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Growing concern about the effects of atmospheric pollutants on climate and human health has accelerated the development of novel analytical methods, including sampling systems, for the determination of atmospheric volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Miniaturised air sampling (MAS) techniques have attracted wide attention in the past two decades due to their advantages (ease of operation, timeintegrated sampling, small/no organic solvent consumption, and potential for automation). This review focuses on the latest developments in these techniques, including needle trap microextraction (NTME), in-tube extraction (ITEX), sorption trap, solid-phase microextraction (SPME fibre, SPME Arrow, and retracted SPME fibre), thin-film microextraction (TFME), solid-phase dynamic extraction (SPDE), and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE). Further, their benefits, drawbacks, and applicability to air sampling are discussed. The applications of MAS techniques for the analysis of atmospheric air, indoor air, breath air, and emissions of plants and foods are summarised and discussed. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available