4.6 Article

Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations perspective

Journal

TECHNOVATION
Volume 99, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102130

Keywords

Absorptive capacity; Goal orientation; Innovative performance; Team-level coordination

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates how employees' goal orientations affect individual absorptive capacity, and how absorptive capacity influences collective innovation performance. The findings show that individual learning and prove orientations are important predictors of absorptive capacity, and well-coordinated individual absorptive capacity leads to positive collective innovation outcomes.
Concurrent increase in the degree of competition and access to information makes it both a challenge and necessity for firms to develop their ability to sense, seize and exploit knowledge-based advantages. Since absorptive capacity reflects an organization's ability to extract innovative ideas from its environment, it plays a critical role in fostering intrapreneurship and innovative performance within existing firms. In this paper, we adopt micro-foundations perspective and study how goal orientations of employees affect their individual-level absorptive capacity, which would in turn shape collective innovative performance. Furthermore, we examine conditions under which individuals' absorptive capacities can efficiently aggregate and leads to increased collective innovation performance. We tested our theoretical model using an original dataset collected from 648 knowledge workers from 126 functional areas. Our analysis show that individuals' learning and prove orientation are important predictors of their absorptive capacity, and that individuals' aggregate absorptive capacity would lead to positive innovation outcomes especially when their activities are highly coordinated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available