4.7 Article

Structure Determination of the Transactivation Domain of p53 in Complex with S100A4 Using Annexin A2 as a Crystallization Chaperone

Journal

STRUCTURE
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages 943-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2020.05.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Development and Innovation Fund of Hungary [K 119359, 20181.2.1-NKP-2018-00005, 2018-1.2.1-NKP]
  2. European Union [VEKOP-2.3.2-16-2017-00014, VEKOP-2.3.3-152017-00018]
  3. State of Hungary [VEKOP-2.3.2-16-2017-00014, VEKOP-2.3.3-152017-00018]
  4. European Regional Development Fund
  5. National Research Development and Innovation Office [NKFIH-1157-8/2019-DT]
  6. ELTE Thematic Excellence Programme - Hungarian Ministry for Innovation and Technology
  7. Post-doctorants en France program of the Fondation ARC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To fully understand the environmental factors that influence crystallization is an enormous task, therefore crystallographers are still forced to work blindly trying as many crystallizing conditions and mutations to improve crystal packing as possible. Numerous times these random attempts simply fail even when using state-of-the-art techniques. As an alternative, crystallization chaperones, having good crystal-forming properties, can be invoked. Today, the almost exclusively used such protein is the maltose-binding protein (MBP) and crystallographers need other widely applicable options. Here, we introduce annexin A2 (ANXA2), which has just as good, if not better, crystal-forming ability than the wild-type MBP. Using ANXA2 as heterologous fusion partner, we were able to solve the atomic resolution structure of a challenging crystallization target, the transactivation domain (TAD) of p53 in complex with the metastasis-associated protein S100A4. p53 TAD forms an asymmetric fuzzy complex with the symmetric S1004 and could interfere with its function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available