4.6 Article

A novel quasi-reflected Harris hawks optimization algorithm for global optimization problems

Journal

SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 24, Issue 19, Pages 14825-14843

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-04834-7

Keywords

Harris hawks optimization; Quasi-reflection-based learning; Opposition-based learning; Benchmark functions; Swarm-based intelligent algorithms

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41404008]
  2. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory for Digital Land and Resources of Jiangxi Province [DLLJ201911]
  3. Guiding Project of Fujian Science and Technology Program [2018Y0021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Harris hawks optimization (HHO) is a recently developed meta-heuristic optimization algorithm based on hunting behavior of Harris hawks. Similar to other meta-heuristic algorithms, HHO tends to be trapped in low diversity, local optima and unbalanced exploitation ability. In order to improve the performance of HHO, a novel quasi-reflected Harris hawks algorithm (QRHHO) is proposed, which combines HHO algorithm and quasi-reflection-based learning mechanism (QRBL) together. The improvement includes two parts: the QRBL mechanism is introduced firstly to increase the population diversity in the initial stage, and then, QRBL is added in each population position update to improve the convergence rate. The proposed method will also be helpful to control the balance between exploration and exploitation. The performance of QRHHO has been tested on twenty-three benchmark functions of various types and dimensions. Through comparison with the basic HHO, HHO combined with opposition-based learning mechanism and HHO combined with quasi-opposition-based learning mechanism, the results demonstrate that QRHHO can effectively improve the convergence speed and solution accuracy of the basic HHO and two variants of HHO. At the same time, QRHHO is also better than other swarm-based intelligent algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available