4.8 Article

Stable Phosphorus-Enriched (0001) Surfaces of Nickel Phosphides

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 28, Issue 15, Pages 5365-5372

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b01437

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Energy, Division of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-07ER15920]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-12-1-1033]
  3. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1334241]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In heterogeneous catalysis, catalyst synthesis precedes operation and, in most cases, is conducted in an I/4 subunit altogether different chemical environment. Thus, determination of the structure and composition of the catalyst surface(s) due to fabrication is essential in accurately evaluating their eventual structure(s) during operation, which provides the origin of their catalytic activities and are therefore key to catalyst optimization. We explore the reconstructions of both Ni2P(0001) and Ni5P4(0001)/(000 (1) over bar) surfaces with first principles density functional theory (DFT). Most of the stable terminations under realistic synthesis conditions are determined to be P-rich on both materials. A P-covered reconstruction of the Ni3P2 termination of Ni2P(0001) is found to be most stable, consistent with the current literature. By contrast, the most energetically favorable surfaces of Ni5P4 are found to be the Ni3P3 and Ni4P3 bulk-derived terminations with P-adatoms. The preferred excess P binding sites and their energies are identified on each surface. We find that the P-3 site, which is present on Ni5P4, and the Ni-3 site, which is present on both Ni2P and Ni5P4, strongly bind excess P. Additionally, we predict the presence of stable P-n (n = 2, 4) agglomerates on Ni5P4 at the P-3-hollow and Ni Ni bridge sites. This study highlights the importance of considering the aggregation behavior of nonmetal components in predicting the surface reconstruction of transition metal compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available