4.7 Article

Promoting mercury removal from desulfurization slurry via S-doped carbon nitride/graphene oxide 3D hierarchical framework

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 239, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116515

Keywords

S-doped carbon nitride nanotube; Large flake size graphene oxide; 3D hierarchical framework; Mercury removal; Hg-0-emission inhibition

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0204102, 2017YFC0210201]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [B2017502069]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21607044, 51878273]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018MS113]
  5. Fundacion General CSIC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mercury removal from the valuable-product yielding desulfurization is a great challenge to purify the desulfurization byproduct. Here, we establish a carbon nanomaterials-based strategy to improve such adsorption efficiency by integrating S-doped carbon nitride nanotube with large flake size graphene oxide (LGO) to fabricate a porous three-dimensional adsorbent. Theoretical calculations and experimental results indicate that such hierarchical framework could effectively and selectively enhance adsorbing of Hg2+ via both physical approach (electrostatic forces by the tubular shape of S-doped g-C3N4 nanotube) and chemistry route (coordination bonding though S doped/containing sites). Additionally, cell viability is estimated by MTT proliferation tests in this study to reveal the biocompatibility. Finally, the absorbent is further employed in a practical industry level approach in the ammonia desulfurization slurry to prohibit its re-emission and upgrade the desulfurization byproduct. Thus, this system is expected to provide a new insight on the practical construction of nanomaterials for mercury removal and the management of real industrial wastewater.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available