4.8 Article

Nanobodies and Antibodies for Duplexed EGFR/HER2 Immunoassays Using Terbium-to-Quantum Dot FRET

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 28, Issue 22, Pages 8256-8267

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03198

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union (Innovative Medicines Initiative)
  2. Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC)
  3. Universite Paris-Sud
  4. Taiwanese Ministry of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biosensors based on the combination of semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) and Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) have demonstrated many advantages for simple, fast, sensitive, and multiplexed diagnostics. However, the implementation of QDs as functional standard materials into homogeneous (single-step) FRET immunoassays has not yet been accomplished, because profound investigations of antibody-conjugation strategies concerning their influence on diagnostic performance for quantifying clinical biomarkers are lacking. Here, we report about a systematic study of size, type, orientation, specificity, nonspecific binding, and cross-reactivity of antibodies conjugated to QDs for single and duplexed EGFR and HER2 immunoassays. Time-gated terbium-to-quantum dot FRET detection on a clinical immunoassay fluorescence plate reader (KRYPTOR) enabled a direct comparison of matuzumab, cetuximab, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab monoclonal antibodies and EgA1, EgB4, 11A4, and 18Al2 VHH nanobodies conjugated to 605 and 650 nm emitting QDs. Detection limits of 2.9 ng/mL EGFR, using cetuximab and matuzumab conjugates, and 8.0 ng/mL HER2, using oriented 11A4 and 18Al2 conjugates, demonstrated the capability of detecting concentrations well below the clinical cutoff values. Multiplexed assays could quantify EGFR and HER2 at low nanomolar concentrations from the same sample. Our results show that careful optimization of QD-antibody conjugation is a prerequisite to implementing QDs into applied clinical diagnostics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available