4.6 Article

A Critical Evaluation of Vibrational Stark Effect (VSE) Probes with the Local Vibrational Mode Theory

Journal

SENSORS
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s20082358

Keywords

Stark spectroscopy; vibrational Stark effect; VSE; local vibrational mode theory; normal mode decomposition; vibrational Stark effect probes; infrared spectroscopy; electric field; carbonyl; nitrile

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE 1464906]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673175]
  3. Double First-Class University Construction Project of Northwest University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Over the past two decades, the vibrational Stark effect has become an important tool to measure and analyze the in situ electric field strength in various chemical environments with infrared spectroscopy. The underlying assumption of this effect is that the normal stretching mode of a target bond such as CO or CN of a reporter molecule (termed vibrational Stark effect probe) is localized and free from mass-coupling from other internal coordinates, so that its frequency shift directly reflects the influence of the vicinal electric field. However, the validity of this essential assumption has never been assessed. Given the fact that normal modes are generally delocalized because of mass-coupling, this analysis was overdue. Therefore, we carried out a comprehensive evaluation of 68 vibrational Stark effect probes and candidates to quantify the degree to which their target normal vibration of probe bond stretching is decoupled from local vibrations driven by other internal coordinates. The unique tool we used is the local mode analysis originally introduced by Konkoli and Cremer, in particular the decomposition of normal modes into local mode contributions. Based on our results, we recommend 31 polyatomic molecules with localized target bonds as ideal vibrational Stark effect probe candidates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available