4.8 Article

Immune profiles provide insights into respiratory syncytial virus disease severity in young children

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 540, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw0268

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [AI112524]
  2. NCH intramural funds
  3. European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases Fellowship Award
  4. Finnish Medical Foundation
  5. Foundation for Pediatric Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is associated with major morbidity in infants, although most cases result in mild disease. The pathogenesis of the disease is incompletely understood, especially the determining factors of disease severity. A better characterization of these factors may help with development of RSV vaccines and antivirals. Hence, identification of a safe and protective immunoprofile induced by natural RSV infection could be used as a as a surrogate of ideal vaccine-elicited responses in future clinical trials. In this study, we integrated blood transcriptional and cell immune profiling, RSV loads, and clinical data to identify factors associated with a mild disease phenotype in a cohort of 190 children <2 years of age. Children with mild disease (outpatients) showed higher RSV loads, greater induction of interferon (IFN) and plasma cell genes, and decreased expression of inflammation and neutrophil genes versus children with severe disease (inpatients). Additionally, only infants with severe disease had increased numbers of HLA-DRlow monocytes, not present in outpatients. Multivariable analyses confirmed that IFN overexpression was associated with decreased odds of hospitalization, whereas increased numbers of HLA-DRlow monocytes were associated with increased risk of hospitalization. These findings suggest that robust innate immune responses are associated with mild RSV infection in infants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available