4.8 Article

An ocular glymphatic clearance system removes β-amyloid from the rodent eye

Journal

SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 536, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw3210

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [742112]
  2. Novo Nordisk
  3. Lundbeck Foundations
  4. Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  5. NIH/NINDS/NIA/NEI [R01NS100366, RF1AG057575, R01EY028995]
  6. Research to Prevent Blindness Foundation (Research to Prevent Blindness Stein Innovation Award)
  7. Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  8. Western Norway Regional Health Authority (Helse Vest grant) [912179, 912230]
  9. Norwegian Glaucoma Research Foundation
  10. European Research Council (ERC) [742112] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite high metabolic activity, the retina and optic nerve head lack traditional lymphatic drainage. We here identified an ocular glymphatic clearance route for fluid and wastes via the proximal optic nerve in rodents. beta-amyloid (A beta) was cleared from the retina and vitreous via a pathway dependent on glial water channel aquaporin-4 (AQP4) and driven by the ocular-cranial pressure difference. After traversing the lamina barrier, intra-axonal A beta was cleared via the perivenous space and subsequently drained to lymphatic vessels. Light-induced pupil constriction enhanced efflux, whereas atropine or raising intracranial pressure blocked efflux. In two distinct murine models of glaucoma, A. leaked from the eye via defects in the lamina barrier instead of directional axonal efflux. The results suggest that, in rodents, the removal of fluid and metabolites from the intraocular space occurs through a glymphatic pathway that might be impaired in glaucoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available