4.7 Article

Moss as a biomonitor for the atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic microfibres

Journal

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume 715, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136973

Keywords

Microfibres; Biomonitoring; Moss; Atmospheric deposition

Funding

  1. Irish Environmental Protection Agency [2016-CCRP-MS.43]
  2. Environmental Protection Agency Ireland (EPA) [2016-CCRP-MS.43] Funding Source: Environmental Protection Agency Ireland (EPA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microplastics, which are plastic particles < 5 mm, have been found throughout the environment. However, few studies have focused on their transport via atmospheric deposition. Bryophytes have been used as biomonitors for the atmospheric deposition of trace elements, persistent organic pollutants and particulate matter, and may potentially be used to monitor the atmospheric deposition of microplastics or anthropogenic microfibres (ml). Hylocomium splendens was collected from three lake catchments, which are remote from anthropogenic disturbance and emissions sources. Anthropogenic mf were observed in all moss samples; the average number was 24 mf g(-1) dry weight (range: 15-30 mf g(-1)) across the three study sites. The average length of mf was 1.02 mm (range: 0.83-120 mm). Plastic mf were identified using five rigorous visual criteria; 27% of the observed mf passed four criteria and 13% passed all five, suggesting at most a quarter of the mf may be plastic. Annual average atmospheric deposition of anthropogenic mf across the three lake catchments was estimated at similar to 47,700 mf m(-2) (similar to 12,000 plastic mf m(-2)), based on a moss biomass of 2 kg dry weight m(-2) . These preliminary findings suggest that moss may be a useful biomonitor for the atmospheric deposition of mf (and microplastics). (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available