4.8 Article

SARS-CoV-2 infection protects against rechallenge in rhesus macaques

Journal

SCIENCE
Volume 369, Issue 6505, Pages 812-+

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abc4776

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard
  2. Mark and Lisa Schwartz Foundation
  3. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  4. Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness (MassCPR)
  5. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation [INV-006131]
  6. Janssen Vaccines Prevention BV
  7. National Institutes of Health [OD024917, AI129797, AI124377, AI128751, AI126603, AI135098, AI007387, AI007151, AI146779, 272201700036I-0-759301900131-1, AI100625, AI110700, AI132178, AI149644, AI108197, CA225088, OD011092, OD025002]
  8. Mercatus Center at George Mason University
  9. Burroughs Wellcome Fund Postdoctoral Enrichment Program Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An understanding of protective immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is critical for vaccine and public health strategies aimed at ending the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. A key unanswered question is whether infection with SARS-CoV-2 results in protective immunity against reexposure. We developed a rhesus macaque model of SARS-CoV-2 infection and observed that macaques had high viral loads in the upper and lower respiratory tract, humoral and cellular immune responses, and pathologic evidence of viral pneumonia. After the initial viral clearance, animals were rechallenged with SARS-CoV-2 and showed 5 log(10) reductions in median viral loads in bronchoalveolar lavage and nasal mucosa compared with after the primary infection. Anamnestic immune responses after rechallenge suggested that protection was mediated by immunologic control. These data show that SARS-CoV-2 infection induced protective immunity against reexposure in nonhuman primates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available