Journal
CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 28, Issue 21, Pages 7898-7904Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03454
Keywords
-
Funding
- NorthEast Center for Chemical Energy Storage (NECCES), an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012583]
- Center for Scientific Computing from the CNSI
- MRL: an NSF MRSEC [DMR-1121053]
- Hewlett-Packard
- National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC) - Office of Science and U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Many layered oxide and sulfide intercalation compounds used in secondary batteries undergo stacking sequence-change phase transformations during (de)intercalation. However, the underlying reasons why different intercalants result in different stacking-sequence changes are not well understood. This work reports on high-throughput density functional theory calculations on the prototype systems A(x)CoO(2) and A(x)TiS(2) (where A = [Li, Na, K, Mg, and Ca]), which show that a few simple rules explain the relative stability among the O1, O1, and P3 stacking sequences. First, for large intercalants (Na, K, and Ca), P3 stacking is favorable at intermediate concentrations (x similar to 0.5) as its intercalant site topology minimizes in-plane electrostatic repulsion. At the extreme compositions (x similar to 0 and x similar to 1), O1 or O3 are stable, with more ionic compounds preferring O3 and covalent ones O1. These rules explain why stacking-sequence changes are much more common in Na materials than Li ones.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available