4.5 Article

Development and testing of a low cost simulation manikin for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) using 3-dimensional printing

Journal

RESUSCITATION
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 24-29

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.032

Keywords

ECMO; CPR; ECPR; 3D printing; Prehospital; Simulation; Manikin; Cannulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: There has been an explosive growth of ECPR within new and established ECMO programs worldwide with the concomitant need for simulation trainers. However, current commercially available ECMO simulation models are expensive and lack many standard cardiorespiratory resuscitative (CPR) features. Objective: To use 3-dimensional (3D) printing to develop a training manikin for comprehensive ECPR simulation. Methods: A standard commercially available CPR manikin with airway model was used as the base model for modification. An inexpensive 3D printer was used to print a modular plastic pelvis. A medical silicone gel incorporated silicone femoral vasculature component was manufactured with connection to a gravity fed vascular system. Results: The resulting modified manikin included the modular in-house designed ECMO cannulation and vascular structures wedded to the commercially available airway and CPR components. In simulation exercise involving first responders, paramedics, and emergency and critical care physicians, the model was reported as realistic with ultrasound views, cannulation, and resuscitative components functional. The entire cost for development of the ECMO component was estimated at $2000 Australian dollars AUD, including the printer purchase and supplies. Future reuse of components is estimated to cost less than $5 AUD per simulation run. Conclusions: A novel in-house modified manikin for ECPR was developed that was cost-efficient and realistic to use from first response through to establishment of ECMO circulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available