4.7 Article

A novel wind power probabilistic forecasting approach based on joint quantile regression and multi-objective optimization

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 141-164

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.143

Keywords

Composite kernels; Joint quantile estimation; Multi-objective salp swarm optimization algorithm (MSSA); Wind forecasting

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71701053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Probabilistic forecasts of wind power generation play a significant role in operation management and decision-making for wind power producers and power system operators. This study introduces a novel joint quantile model based on the use of Mercer's kernels in the vector-valued RKHSs (Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces) for the nonparametric probabilistic forecasts of wind power. The proposed approach takes the autocorrelation of the (nonlinearly) transformed input and output into consideration and improves the model flexibility by constructing composite kernels. Besides, the model is optimized by a new meta-heuristics algorithm named Multi-Objective Salp Swarm Optimization Algorithm (MSSA), which mathematically models and mimics the behavior of salp swarms for solving multiple objective optimization problems. Under this model framework, several conditional quantiles of wind power can be estimated and predicted at the same time. Moreover, due to the joint estimation process, the problem of quantile curve crossing can be effectively weakened during the process of model training. The qualitative and quantitative performances of the proposed method are tested and verified on a set of real case studies. The results show that the proposed algorithm provides superior outputs compared to the well-known and recent algorithms in the literature. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available