4.7 Article

Potable water extraction from the atmosphere: Potential of MOFs

Journal

RENEWABLE ENERGY
Volume 148, Issue -, Pages 72-80

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.003

Keywords

Water harvesting from air; Adsorption; Metal-organic frameworks; Water extraction fraction; Water collection fraction

Funding

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Researches [18-29-04033]
  2. Boreskov Institute of Catalysis [AAAA-A17-117041110045-9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This communication addresses the Adsorptive Extraction of potable Water from the Atmosphere (AWEA) in arid areas using solar energy. The method includes a) adsorption of water vapor from the air at nighttime, and b) desorption of the stored water and its subsequent collection in a condenser in the day-time. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), being crystalline porous solids with unique adsorption properties, might provide a promising avenue for AWEA. First, the thermodynamic requirements for adsorbent optimal for AWEA are formulated. The optimal adsorbent (OA) has energy different adsorption centers with the affinity distributed in a wide range of adsorption potential between Delta F-ad and Delta F-re, corresponding to the adsorption and regeneration stages, respectively. For three arid climatic zones (the Sahara Desert, Saudi Arabia and Central Australia), the quantitative requirements to the OA are formulated in terms of the Delta F-ad and Delta F-re values. The selection of MOFs, promising for the AWEA, is carried out. The most promising MOFs for Australia are MIL-101(Cr), Co2Cl2(BTDD), and MIL-101(Cr)-SO3H. MIL-160 and CAU-10(pydc) are appropriate for Saudi Arabia and Sahara. They exchange 0.34-1.6 (g water)/(g adsorbent) and allow getting the fractions delta(ex) = 0.78-0.93 of water extraction and delta(col) = 0.75-0.90 of water collection at the regeneration temperature 75-100 degrees C. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available