4.6 Article

Superscan: Superiority of xSPECT/CT over OSEM SPECT/CT in bone scans of prostate cancer patients

Journal

RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108998

Keywords

Prostate cancer; Skeletal; Scintigraphy; Metastasis; xSPECT/CT; SPECT/CT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that using xSPECT/CT Bone or standard OSEM SPECT/CT algorithm in prostate cancer patients with high PSA levels can improve the diagnostic accuracy of bone scans, particularly in delineating areas of bone metastasis.
Prostate cancer is one of the most common cancers affecting men. Bone scan is part of the staging modality commonly used to evaluate bone metastasis. A bone scan with diffused increased skeletal tracer uptake relative to soft tissue, combined with faint renal activity is known as a superscan. However, a primary concern are false negatives associated with bone scans, where diffuse metastasis is indistinguishable on superscans. In this study, we performed xSPECT/CT Bone and standard OSEM SPECT/CT reconstruction algorithm in ten prostate cancer patients with high PSA levels, where they initially seem relatively unremarkable on planar images. All patients with extensive bone metastases showed either relatively unremarkable scans or did not demonstrate the true extent of metastatic burden as seen on planar images. Uptake was further confirmed by the correlative diffuse bone lesions on CT images. Our reports also indicated that xSPECT/CT reconstructed images were far superior in delineating focal areas of osteoblastic bone metastasis, when compared with whole body planar images or SPECT/CT images. The extent of metastatic evidence is delineated with excellent clarification by xSPECT/CT images. We propose that whole body xSPECT/CT image reconstruction, or at least SPECT/CT, should be performed in patients with high PSA levels, along with planar imaging, to improve diagnostic accuracy of bone scans in prostate cancer staging.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available