4.7 Article

Effects of low-melting glass powder on the thermal stabilities of low infrared emissivity Al/polysiloxane coatings

Journal

PROGRESS IN ORGANIC COATINGS
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2020.105579

Keywords

Low-emissivity coating; Thermal stability; Low-melting glass; Flake aluminum

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972276]
  2. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2019YFG0442]
  3. Ministry of Education of China [Z2017072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, low infrared emissivity coatings with good thermal stabilities were fabricated using silicone resin as adhesive, flake aluminum powder as pigment, and low-melting glass powder as functional filler. The effects of the low-melting glass powder on the adhesions, thermal expansions, and infrared emissivity of the coatings were systematically investigated. In addition, the surface microstructures and thermal stability mechanisms of the coatings were analyzed in detail. Mechanical tests showed that the addition of the low-melting glass powder to the Al/polysiloxane coating enhanced its adhesion after a high-temperature treatment due to the mechanical interlocking of the particles by the secondary film-forming low-melting glass. Thermal analysis indicated that the oxidation resistance of the coating could be improved by the film-forming low-melting glass powder. The low-emissivity coating with a low-melting glass powder content of approximately 15 wt .% and Al/polysiloxane ratio of 1.5 exhibited good thermal stability. The adhesion of the coating increased to 9.0 +/- 0.4 MPa after heating at 500 degrees C. When the content of the low-melting glass was increased from 0 to 15 wt. %, the oxidation exothermic peak of the coating shifted from 590 to 625 degrees C at a pigment/binder ratio of 1.5. The infrared emissivity of the coating was 0.25 after heating at 600 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available