4.6 Article

Extraction of chlorophylls and carotenoids from dry and wet biomass of isolated Chlorella Thermophila: Optimization of process parameters and modelling by artificial neural network

Journal

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 58-72

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.05.025

Keywords

Microalgae; Chlorophyll; Carotenoids; Extraction efficiency; Green solvent; Artificial neural network modelling

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department of Science and Technology, Government of India [CRG/2018/002479]
  2. Ministry of Human Resource and Developments, Government of India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chlorophylls and carotenoids can be extracted from microalgae using various solvents. However, there is lack of studies regarding the comparison of extraction yield of these pigments from wet and dry microalgal biomass using different combination of cell disruption methods. Therefore, in this work, we have investigated the comparison of the extraction yield of chlorophylls and carotenoids from the wet and heat-dried microalgal biomass (isolated Chlorella thermophila) using ethanol. Extraction parameters such as homogenisation time, homogenisation speed, solvent temperature, solid-solvent ratio, boiling time and microwave time have been optimised. Chlorophyll extraction yield was observed to be 2.7 fold higher from wet biomass than dry biomass while carotenoid yield was 6.7 fold higher. Highest chlorophyll yield ( similar to 60 mg/g-dry biomass) was observed at 6 min of homogenisation time, 10,000 rpm, solid solvent ratio of 1 mg/mL and 58 degrees C of solvent temperature from wet biomass with extraction efficiency of similar to 94 %. Highest carotenoid yield was noticed following the same conditions of chlorophyll extraction except 4 degrees C of solvent temperature. The modelling of the extraction process was performed using artificial neural network (ANN) which may be useful for the scale-up of the extraction process at the industrial level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available