4.8 Article

Optimizing Rhizobium-legume symbioses by simultaneous measurement of rhizobial competitiveness and N2 fixation in nodules

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921225117

Keywords

nodulation; legume; rhizobium; competition; nitrogen-fixing

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L011484/1, BB/N003608/1, BB/N013387/1]
  2. Mexican Government Grant Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia [266954/399852]
  3. University of Oxford Disability Advisory Service
  4. BBSRC [BB/N013387/1, BB/L011484/1, BB/K006134/1, BB/N003608/1, BB/T001801/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Legumes tend to be nodulated by competitive rhizobia that do not maximize nitrogen (N-2) fixation, resulting in suboptimal yields. Rhizobial nodulation competitiveness and effectiveness at N-2 fixation are independent traits, making their measurement extremely time-consuming with low experimental throughput. To transform the experimental assessment of rhizobial competitiveness and effectiveness, we have used synthetic biology to develop reporter plasmids that allow simultaneous high-throughput measurement of N-2 fixation in individual nodules using green fluorescent protein (GFP) and barcode strain identification (Plasmid ID) through next generation sequencing (NGS). In a proof-of-concept experiment using this technology in an agricultural soil, we simultaneously monitored 84 different Rhizobium leguminosarum strains, identifying a supercompetitive and highly effective rhizobial symbiont for peas. We also observed a remarkable frequency of nodule coinfection by rhizobia, with mixed occupancy identified in similar to 20% of nodules, containing up to six different strains. Critically, this process can be adapted to multiple Rhizobium-legume symbioses, soil types, and environmental conditions to permit easy identification of optimal rhizobial inoculants for field testing to maximize agricultural yield.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available