4.8 Article

Seasonal hysteresis of surface urban heat islands

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1917554117

Keywords

cities; hysteresis; seasonality; surface temperature; urban heat island

Funding

  1. Branco Weiss Fellowship-Society in Science
  2. Army Research Office [W911NF-15-1-0003]
  3. NSF [ICER-1664021, 1444758, NSF-AGS-1644382, NSF-IOS-1754893]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Temporal dynamics of urban warming have been extensively studied at the diurnal scale, but the impact of background climate on the observed seasonality of surface urban heat islands (SUHIs) remains largely unexplored. On seasonal time scales, the intensity of urban-rural surface temperature differences (Delta T-s) exhibits distinctive hysteretic cycles whose shape and looping direction vary across climatic zones. These observations highlight possible delays underlying the dynamics of the coupled urban-biosphere system. However, a general argument explaining the observed hysteretic patterns remains elusive. A coarse-grained model of SUHI coupled with a stochastic soil water balance is developed to demonstrate that the time lags between radiation forcing, air temperature, and rainfall generate a rate-dependent hysteresis, explaining the observed seasonal variations of Delta T-s. If solar radiation is in phase with water availability, summer conditions cause strong SUHI intensities due to high rural evaporative cooling. Conversely, cities in seasonally dry regions where evapotranspiration is out of phase with radiation show a summertime oasis effect controlled by background climate and vegetation properties. These seasonal patterns of warming and cooling have significant implications for heat mitigation strategies as urban green spaces can reduce Delta T-s during summertime, while potentially negative effects of albedo management during winter are mitigated by the seasonality of solar radiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available