4.8 Article

Measuring the predictability of life outcomes with a scientific mass collaboration

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1915006117

Keywords

life course; prediction; machine learning; mass collaboration

Funding

  1. Russell Sage Foundation
  2. NSF Grant [1760052]
  3. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) [P2-CHD047879]
  4. NICHD [R01-HD36916, R01-HD39135, R01-HD40421]
  5. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  6. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  7. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1760052] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. EPSRC [EP/N510129/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. MRC [MC_PC_17209] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

How predictable are life trajectories? We investigated this question with a scientific mass collaboration using the common task method; 160 teams built predictive models for six life outcomes using data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, a high-quality birth cohort study. Despite using a rich dataset and applying machine-learning methods optimized for prediction, the best predictions were not very accurate and were only slightly better than those from a simple benchmark model. Within each outcome, prediction error was strongly associated with the family being predicted and weakly associated with the technique used to generate the prediction. Overall, these results suggest practical limits to the predictability of life outcomes in some settings and illustrate the value of mass collaborations in the social sciences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available