4.7 Article

Effect of nitric acid on the pore structure and fractal characteristics of coal based on the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption method

Journal

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
Volume 367, Issue -, Pages 506-516

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.04.011

Keywords

Nitric acid treatment; law-temperature nitrogen adsorption; Coal characteristics; Pore structure; Fractal dimension

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51704186, 51934004]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFC0805201]
  3. Major Program of Shandong Province Natural Science Foundation [ZR2018ZA0602]
  4. Key Research and Development Plan of Shandong Province, China [2018GSF116010]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M622235, 2019T120599]
  6. Shandong Province Postdoctoral Innovation Project [201703025]
  7. Qingdao Postdoctoral Researcher Applied Research Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To study the pore structure and fractal characteristics of add-treated coal, in this paper, the low-temperature nitrogen adsorption method, scanning electron microscopy and the fractal theory were used to analyze the coal samples. The results show that the acid treatment enlarged the wedge-shaped hole into a cylindrical hole. Under the influence of HNO3, the ash, volatile and sulfur contents are negatively correlated with the fractal dimension of the pore surface (D-1) and positively correlated with the fractal dimension of the pore structure (D-2). And the specific surface area and total pore volume of the coal samples are positively correlated with D-1 and negatively correlated with D-2 after acid treatment. Influenced by the specific surface area and total pore volume, the relationship between the fractal dimension and adsorption is consistent with the relationship between the fractal dimension and specific surface area/total pore volume. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available