4.8 Article

Multiple Integrated Root Phenotypes Are Associated with Improved Drought Tolerance1[OPEN]

Journal

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 183, Issue 3, Pages 1011-1025

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.20.00211

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture [2014-67013-21572, 2017-67013-26192]
  2. Howard G. Buffet Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Integrated root phenotypes that optimize water use efficiency and overcome mechanical impedance from dry, hard soils are beneficial for drought tolerance in maize. To test the hypothesis that multiple integrated root phenotypes would co-optimize drought tolerance, we phenotyped the root anatomy and architecture of 400 mature maize (Zea mays) genotypes under well-watered and water-stressed conditions in the field. We found substantial variation in all 23 root phenes measured. A phenotypic bulked segregant analysis revealed that bulks representing the best and worst performers in the field displayed distinct root phenotypes. In contrast to the worst bulk, the root phenotype of the best bulk under drought consisted of greater cortical aerenchyma formation, more numerous and narrower metaxylem vessels, and thicker nodal roots. Partition-against-medians clustering revealed several clusters of unique root phenotypes related to plant performance under water stress. Clusters associated with improved drought tolerance consisted of phene states that likely enable greater soil exploration by reallocating internal resources to greater root construction (increased aerenchyma content, larger cortical cells, fewer cortical cell files), restrict uptake of water to conserve soil moisture (reduced hydraulic conductance, narrow metaxylem vessels), and improve penetrability of hard, dry soils (thick roots with a larger proportion of stele, and smaller distal cortical cells). We propose that the most drought-tolerant-integrated phenotypes merit consideration as breeding ideotypes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available