4.5 Article

Regional and temporal differentiation of virulence phenotypes of Puccinia triticina from common wheat in Russia during the period 2001-2018

Journal

PLANT PATHOLOGY
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages 860-871

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ppa.13174

Keywords

Kosman distance; leaf rust; Lr resistance genes; population structure; Triticum aestivum

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [19-76-30005] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leaf rust, caused by the fungus Puccinia triticina, is one of the most damaging rust diseases of wheat in Russia. Populations of P. triticina were monitored in seven regions of Russia from 2001 to 2018, with a total of 5,191 single urediniospore isolates from bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) being analysed. Populations have changed significantly in all regions since 2012, after 2 years of drought (2010-2011). Regional collections of P. triticina were also significantly different between the two periods 2001-2009 and 2012-2018, with changes along two geographic gradients from West Siberia to the north-west and south-west (North Caucasia) of the European part of Russia. All tested isolates were avirulent to resistance gene Lr9 in 2001-2009 but, since 2010, virulence to Lr9 has occurred and annually increased in the Asian part of Russia (Ural and West Siberia) due to deployment of cultivars with the Lr9 gene. Virulence to Lr2a and Lr15 was considerably lower in Dagestan (6%-33%) and all European regions (35%-67%) than in Asian regions (84%-96%). During 2001-2009, virulence on Lr1 was also lower in Dagestan (33%) and the European regions (50%-77%) than in Asia (91%-96%); however, by 2012-2018, nearly all isolates were virulent on Lr1. Remarkable changes were observed in frequencies of P. triticina races defined by their virulence/avirulence to Lr1 and Lr2a genes. We postulate the P. triticina population in Dagestan is specific to that area and pathogen populations in European and Asian parts of Russia are distinct.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available