4.7 Article

Genetic Manipulation of Transcriptional Regulators Alters Nicotine Biosynthesis in Tobacco

Journal

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 6, Pages 1041-1053

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcaa036

Keywords

Alkaloids; Genome editing; Nicotiana; Nicotine; Tobacco; Transcription factor

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [17K07447]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [17K07447] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The toxic alkaloid nicotine is produced in the roots of Nicotiana species and primarily accumulates in leaves as a specialized metabolite. A series of metabolic and transport genes involved in the nicotine pathway are coordinately upregulated by a pair of jasmonate-responsive AP2/ERF-family transcription factors, NtERF189 and NtERF199, in the roots of Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco). In this study, we explored the potential of manipulating the expression of these transcriptional regulators to alter nicotine biosynthesis in tobacco. The transient overexpression of NtERF189 led to alkaloid production in the leaves of Nicotiana benthamiana and Nicotiana alata. This ectopic production was further enhanced by co-overexpressing a gene encoding a basic helix-loop-helix-family MYC2 transcription factor. Constitutive and leaf-specific overexpression of NtERF189 increased the accumulation of foliar alkaloids in transgenic tobacco plants but negatively affected plant growth. By contrast, in a knockout mutant of NtERF189 and NtFRF199 obtained through CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing, alkaloid levels were drastically reduced without causing major growth defects. Metabolite profiling revealed the impact of manipulating the nicotine pathway on a wide range of nitrogen- and carbon-containing metabolites. Our findings provide insights into the biotech-nological application of engineering metabolic pathways by targeting transcription factors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available