4.7 Article

On the highly swirling flow through a confined bluff-body

Journal

PHYSICS OF FLUIDS
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5141531

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Center for Fluid and Complex Systems at Coventry University
  2. UGCUKIERI [2016-17-050]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We address highly swirling, confined-bluff-body-flow evolving through a burner; particularly, contributions of the swirling motion to a central-recirculation-zone (CRZ) downstream the injector. Previous studies suggest that flame stability reduces in combustors lacking this zone; careful consideration of the CRZ is thus desirable. We use Reynolds-Averaged-Navier-Stokes (RANS) and Large-Eddy-Simulation (LES) to simulate the flow, and the influence of the swirl device was included in defining the inflow conditions for LES simulations. We use mean velocity profiles and turbulence statistics to test results. There is qualitative agreement between computed and reported experimental data, and we document quantitative differences obtained with the RANS models. LES velocity field results are mostly within 3% of the experimental data, better than the latest reported LES data, reinforcing the suitability of our approach. We took advantage of the quality of the LES mesh, which solves 95.6% of the resolved-turbulence-energy, to present the vorticity structures showing the precessing vortex motion on the CRZ boundaries. Anisotropic states of the Reynolds-stress were characterized with the aid of an anisotropy invariant map, a novelty for this type of burner; the turbulence states considerably vary inside the burner, behaving isotropically in the center of the CRZ, whereas axisymmetric turbulence is predominant in the other areas of the CRZ. The results reinforce the importance of applying appropriate turbulence models and inflow conditions for simulations involving confined-bluff-body-flows in order to capture the main flow fields and structures in the CRZ.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available