4.8 Article

Dark Matter Signals from Timing Spectra at Neutrino Experiments

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 124, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.121802

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DOE [de-sc0010813]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-13ER41976/DE-SC0009913]
  3. College of ScienceStrategic Transformative Research Program (TAMU)
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2019R1C1C1005073, NRF-2018R1A4A1025334, NRF-2017R1D1A1B03032076]
  5. IBS [IBS-R018-D1]
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [IBS-R018-D1-2020-A00] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a novel strategy to search for new physics in timing spectra at low-energy neutrino experiments using a pulsed beam, envisioning the situation in which a new particle comes from the decay of its heavier partner with a finite particle width. The timing distribution of events induced by the dark matter (DM) candidate particle scattering at the detector may populate in a relatively narrow range, forming a resonancelike shape. Because of this structural feature, the signal may be isolated from the backgrounds, in particular when the backgrounds are uniformly distributed in energy and time. For proof of the principle, we investigate the discovery potential for DM from the decay of a dark photon in the ongoing COHERENT experiment and show the exciting prospects for exploring the associated parameter space with this experiment. We analyze the existing CsI detector data with a timing cut and an energy cut, and we find, for the first time, an excess in the timing distribution that can be explained by such DM. We compare the sensitivity to the kinetic mixing parameter (epsilon) for current and future COHERENT experiments with the projected limits from LDMX and DUNE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available