4.8 Article

Constraints on Lorentz Invariance Violation from HAWC Observations of Gamma Rays above 100 TeV

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
Volume 124, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.131101

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of High-Energy Physics
  3. Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program of Los Alamos National Laboratory
  4. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT), Mexico [271051, 232656, 260378, 179588, 254964, 258865, 243290, 132197, A1S-46288, A1-S-22784, 873, 1563, 341, 323]
  5. DGAPA-UNAM [AG100317, IN111315, IN111716-3, IN111419, IA102019, IN112218]
  6. VIEPBUAP
  7. PIFI, PROFOCIE
  8. FAPESP [2015/15897-1, 2017/03680-3]
  9. LNCC/MCTI, Brazil
  10. University of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  11. Institute of Geophysics, Planetary Physics, and Signatures at Los Alamos National Laboratory
  12. Polish Science Centre [DEC-2018/31/B/ST9/01069, DEC-2017/27/B/ST9/02272]
  13. Coordinacion de la Investigacion Cientifica de la Universidad Michoacana
  14. Royal Society-Newton Advanced Fellowship [180385]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Because of the high energies and long distances to the sources, astrophysical observations provide a unique opportunity to test possible signatures of Lorentz invariance violation (LIV). Superluminal LIV enables the decay of photons at high energy. The high altitude water Cherenkov (HAWC) observatory is among the most sensitive gamma-ray instruments currently operating above 10 TeV. HAWC finds evidence of 100 TeV photon emission from at least four astrophysical sources. These observations exclude, for the strongest of the limits set, the LIV energy scale to 2.2 x 10(31) eV, over 1800 times the Planck energy and an improvement of 1 to 2 orders of magnitude over previous limits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available