4.5 Article

The COMPASS force field: Validation for carbon nanoribbons

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2019.113937

Keywords

COMPASS force field; Graphene; Graphane; Fluorographene; Out-of-plane vibrations; Dispersion curves

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-13-10302]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [16-13-10302, 19-13-13056] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COMPASS force field has been successfully applied in a large number of materials simulations, including the analysis of structural, electrical, thermal, and mechanical properties of carbon nanoparticles. This force field has been parameterized using quantum mechanical data and is based on hundreds of molecules as a training set, but such analysis for graphene sheets was not carried out. The objective of the present study is the verification of how good the COMPASS force field parameters can accurately describe the frequency spectrum of atomic vibrations of graphene, graphane and fluorographene sheets. We showed that the COMPASS force field allows us to describe with good accuracy the frequency spectrum of atomic vibrations of graphane and fluorographene sheets, whose honeycomb hexagonal lattice is formed by sp(3) hybridization. On the other hand, the force field does not describe very well the frequency spectrum of graphene sheet, whose planar hexagonal lattice is formed by sp(2) banding. In that case the frequency spectrum of out-of-plane vibrations differs greatly from the experimental data - bending stiffness of a graphene sheet is strongly over estimated. We present the correction of parameters of out-of-plane and torsional potentials of the force field, which allows achieving the coincidence of vibration frequency with experimental data. After such corrections, the COMPASS force field can be used to describe the dynamics of flat graphene sheets and carbon nanotubes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available