4.7 Article

A novel hybrid approach for crack detection

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2020.107474

Keywords

Crack detection; Defect detection; Object detection; Convolutional neural network; Faster R-CNN; Bayesian fusion

Funding

  1. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A* STAR) AME Programmatic Grant, Singapore [A18A2b0046]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vision-based crack detection is of crucial importance in various industries, and it is very challenging due to weak signals in noisy backgrounds. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid approach for crack detection in raw images, which combines deep learning models and Bayesian probabilistic analysis for robust crack detection. First, we re-train a state-of-the-art object detector (e.g. a Faster R-CNN) to detect crack patches of suitable SNR (signal-noise-ratio). We design a semi-automatic method to generate ground truths of crack patches along crack lines for training. To further improve the accuracy of crack detections over the whole image, we propose a Bayesian integration algorithm to suppress false detections. Specifically, we use a deep CNN to recognize the orientation of the crack segment in each detected patch. Then, a Bayesian probability is computed on the accumulated evidence from detected adjacent patches within a neighborhood based on spatial proximity, orientation consistency and alignment consistency. The patch which lacks local supports is suppressed as false detection. An algorithm to learn the parameters of Bayesian integration is also derived. Extensive experiments and evaluations are performed on a new comprehensive dataset of crack images. The results show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art baseline approach on deep CNN classifier. Ablation experiments are also conducted to show the effectiveness of proposed techniques. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available