4.5 Review

Giving and receiving a diagnosis of a progressive neurological condition: A scoping review of doctors' and patients' perspectives

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 103, Issue 9, Pages 1709-1723

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.023

Keywords

Breaking bad news; Diagnosis communication; Neurodegenerative conditions; Motor neurone disease; Multiple sclerosis; Parkinson's disease; Scoping review

Funding

  1. Lancaster University Faculty of Health and Medicine doctoral bursary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Delivering a life changing diagnosis can be a distressing experience for patients and a challenging task for professionals. Diagnosis delivery can be especially difficult for individuals with neurodegenerative diseases such as motor neurone disease (MND), multiple sclerosis (MS) and Parkinson's disease (PD). This review aims to scope the literature on doctors' and patients' perspectives on diagnosis delivery for these conditions in order to enhance our understanding in this area and identify potential research gaps. Methods: A scoping review methodology was used, and data were summarised using content analysis. Results: 47 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Studies showed that although patients were generally satisfied with diagnosis delivery, a considerable proportion was still dissatisfied with aspects of the consultation, especially the information and time provided and the doctor's approach. Only six studies addressed doctors' perspectives, which focused more on doctors' practice. Conclusion: There was a significant research gap in professionals' perspectives. The review also found that although basic standards of good practice were being met, a significant proportion of patients were dissatisfied with diagnosis communication. Practice implications: Professionals delivering such diagnoses need to assess and respond to patients' information needs, provide time for questions and maintain an empathic attitude. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available