4.8 Review

[18F]-Group 13 fluoride derivatives as radiotracers for positron emission tomography

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 954-971

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cs00687b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [RP130604]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1300371]
  3. Welch Foundation [A-1423]
  4. Texas A&M University (Arthur E. Martell Chair of Chemistry)
  5. Development and Promotion of Science and Technology (DPST) program
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Chemistry [1300371] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The field of F-18 chemistry is rapidly expanding because of the use of this radionuclide in radiotracers for positron emission tomography (PET). Until recently, most [F-18]-radiotracers were generated by the direct attachment of F-18 to a carbon in the organic backbone of the radiotracer. The past decade has witnessed the emergence of a new strategy based on the formation of an F-18-group 13 element bond. This approach, which is rooted in the field of fluoride anion complexation/coordination chemistry, has led to the development of a remarkable family of boron, aluminium and gallium [F-18]-fluoride anion complexing agents which can be conjugated with peptides and small molecules to generate disease specific PET radiotracers. This review is dedicated to the chemistry of these group 13 [F-18]-fluorides anion complexing agents and their use in PET. Some of the key fluoride-binding motifs covered in this review include the trifluoroborate unit bound to neutral or cationic electron deficient backbones, the BF2 unit of BODIPY dyes, and AlF or GaF3 units coordinated to multidentate Lewis basic ligands. In addition to describing how these moieties can be converted into their [F-18]-analogs, this review also dicusses their incorporation into bioconjugates for application in PET.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available