4.8 Review

The springtail cuticle as a blueprint for omniphobic surfaces

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 45, Issue 2, Pages 323-341

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5cs00438a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP)/ERC Advanced Grant [340929]
  2. German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) through the grant Mechanically stable anti-adhesive polymer surfaces through biomimetic patterning''

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Omniphobic surfaces found in nature have great potential for enabling novel and emerging products and technologies to facilitate the daily life of human societies. One example is the water and even oil-repellent cuticle of springtails (Collembola). The wingless arthropods evolved a highly textured, hierarchically arranged surface pattern that affords mechanical robustness and wetting resistance even at elevated hydrostatic pressures. Springtail cuticle-derived surfaces therefore promise to overcome limitations of lotus-inspired surfaces (low durability, insufficient repellence of low surface tension liquids). In this review, we report on the liquid-repellent natural surfaces of arthropods living in aqueous or temporarily flooded habitats including water-walking insects or water spiders. In particular, we focus on springtails presenting an overview on the cuticular morphology and chemistry and their biological relevance. Based on the obtained liquid repellence of a variety of liquids with remarkable efficiency, the review provides general design criteria for robust omniphobic surfaces. In particular, the resistance against complete wetting and the mechanical stability strongly both depend on the topographical features of the nano-and micropatterned surface. The current understanding of the underlying principles and approaches to their technological implementation are summarized and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available