4.6 Article

Confocal Bragg ptychography for bulk specimens: a numerical demonstration

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 28, Issue 11, Pages 15770-15782

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.391282

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Research Council [724881, 291321]
  2. Danish Agency for Science and Higher Education [4059-00009B]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [724881, 291321] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report on a new X-ray imaging method, which generalizes Bragg ptychography to 3D mapping of embedded crystalline volumes within thick specimens. The sample is probed by a pencil X-ray beam. The diffracted beam is magnified by an objective and passes through a slit in the image plane to be monitored by a 2D detector in the far-field of the image plane. The dimensions of the incoming beam and the slit opening define a confocal Bragg volume. Scanning the sample with respect to this probe volume, an iterative oversaampling routine is used to reconstruct the shape and projected displacement field of extended internal volumes. This routine takes into account the pupil function and known aberrations of the lens. We demonstrate the method by a numerical study of a 3.5 gm grain comprising a wall of edge dislocations. With a probe volume of similar to 0.12 mu m(3) and a compound refractive lens with a numerical aperture of 0.49x10(-3) as the objective, the dislocations are fully resolved with a displacement sensitivity of similar to 10 pm. The spatial resolution is 26x27x123 nm(3) (rms), with the poor resolution along the optical axis being limited by the probe size. With a four times larger numerical aperture, the resolution becomes 16x8x123 nm(3) (rms). The lens aberrations are found to be not critical. (C) 2020 Optical Society of America under the terms of the OSA Open Access Publishing Agreement

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available