4.8 Review

Manganese Compounds as Water-Oxidizing Catalysts: From the Natural Water-Oxidizing Complex to Nanosized Manganese Oxide Structures

Journal

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
Volume 116, Issue 5, Pages 2886-2936

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00340

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences
  2. National Elite Foundation
  3. Academy of Finland [118637]
  4. JSPS, MEXT, Japan [24000018]
  5. Russian Science Foundation [14-14-00039]
  6. Russian Science Foundation [14-14-00039] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24000018] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All cyanobacteria, algae, and plants use a similar water-oxidizing catalyst for water oxidation. This catalyst is housed in Photosystem II, a membrane-protein complex that functions as a light-driven water oxidase in oxygenic photosynthesis. Water oxidation is also an important reaction in artificial photosynthesis because it has the potential to provide cheap electrons from water for hydrogen production or for the reduction of carbon dioxide on an industrial scale. The water-oxidizing complex of Photosystem II is a Mn-Ca cluster that oxidizes water with a low overpotential and high turnover frequency number of up to 25-90 molecules of O-2 released per second. In this Review, we discuss the atomic structure of the Mn-Ca cluster of the Photosystem II water-oxidizing complex from the viewpoint that the underlying mechanism can be informative when designing artificial water-oxidizing catalysts. This is followed by consideration of functional Mn-based model complexes for water oxidation and the issue of Mn complexes decomposing to Mn oxide. We then provide a detailed assessment of the chemistry of Mn oxides by considering how their bulk and nanoscale properties contribute to their effectiveness as water-oxidizing catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available