4.8 Review

Cationic Noncovalent Interactions: Energetics and Periodic Trends

Journal

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
Volume 116, Issue 9, Pages 5642-5687

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00688

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1409420, CHE-1359769, PIRE-0730072, IRES-1357887]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  3. Division Of Chemistry [1359769] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1409420] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Office Of The Director
  7. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [1357887] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, noncovalent interactions of ions with neutral molecules are discussed. After defining the scope of the article, which excludes anionic and most protonated systems, methods associated with measuring thermodynamic information for such systems are briefly recounted. An extensive set of tables detailing available thermodynamic information for the noncovalent interactions of metal cations with a host of ligands is provided. Ligands include small molecules (H-2, NH3, CO, CS, H2O, CH3CN, and others), organic ligands (O- and N-donors, crown ethers and related molecules, MALDI matrix molecules), pi-ligands (alkenes, alkynes, benzene, and substituted benzenes), miscellaneous inorganic ligands, and biological systems (amino acids, peptides, sugars, nucleobases, nucleosides, and nucleotides). Hydration of metalated biological systems is also included along with selected proton-based systems: 18-crown-6 polyether with protonated peptides and base-pairing energies of nucleobases. In all cases, the literature thermochemistry is evaluated and, in many cases, reanchored or adjusted to 0 K bond dissociation energies. Trends in these values are discussed and related to, a variety, of simple molecular concepts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available