4.8 Review

Fluorine and Gold: A Fruitful Partnership

Journal

CHEMICAL REVIEWS
Volume 116, Issue 19, Pages 11924-11966

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00203

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTQ2013-43310-P]
  2. Generalitat Valenciana [GV/PrometeoII/2014/073]
  3. University of Valencia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gold-catalyzed reactions have witnessed an exponential growth in the past decade. When the unique modes of activation exhibited by gold species meet species with either fluorinated building blocks or fluorinating reagents, new opportunities arise for the development of new methodologies in fluoroorganic chemistry. Indeed, gold and fluorine truly formed a very fruitful partnership, and different types of reactivity emerged from their combination. This review gives an overview of such endeavors. The special properties imparted by fluorine to organic molecules have been exploited in gold-catalyzed processes, allowing for the generation of unprecedented fluorinated chemical entities. Thus, the interaction of gold salts with fluorinated building blocks has been revised. In a second section, recent developments in gold-catalyzed nucleophilic fluorinations have been covered. The development of new gold catalysts that stabilize the Au-F bond as well as recent mechanistic studies in the field raised the interest of these types of methodologies for the generation of new C-F bonds. The use of electrophilic fluorine sources enabled new modes of gold catalysis. The incorporation of Selectfluor as an external oxidant constituted a new paradigm in gold chemistry, incorporating the elusive Au(I)/Au(III) redox couple in gold-catalyzed transformations. This strategy provided access to both new fluorinated chemical entities and nonfluorinated derivatives by means of coupling reactions. Those topics have been reviewed in the last two sections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available