4.4 Article

Combined Laparoscopic Revision of the Gastric Pouch and Distalization of the Roux Limb After Failure of Weight Loss Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Journal

OBESITY SURGERY
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 2851-2853

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-020-04476-6

Keywords

Surgical technique; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Failure of weight loss; Gastric pouch resizing

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose After failed Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), the choice of a secondary procedure falls into many pathways: revision of the gastric pouch, distalization of the bypass (DRYGB), addition of an adjustable gastric band, and conversion to a duodenal switch (BPD/DS). Material and Methods We present the case of a 54-year-old man with initial BMI of 51.5 kg/m(2), who first underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in 2010. In 2012, he underwent a RYGB procedure, and in 2015, a pouch resizing for weight regain. In 2018, he reached a BMI of 41.2 kg/m(2). A 3D volumetric CT scan measured a gastric pouch volume of 220 cm(3) and a gastrojejunal anastomosis diameter of 20 mm. Results As shown in the video, the patient underwent a combined revision of the gastric pouch and the gastrojejunal anastomosis associated to the distalization of the Roux limb. The gastrojejunal anastomosis is identified, and vertical division of the stomach is performed along a 36 French bougie, in order to create a 30 cm(3) gastric pouch. Then, the jejunojejunal anastomosis is identified, and the Roux limb at the jejunojejunostomy is divided and transposed distally 100 cm to create a total alimentary length of 250 cm. The postoperative course was uneventful. At 1 year, his BMI was 31.2 kg/m(2). No nutritional deficiencies were noted. Conclusion Combined laparoscopic pouch resizing and distalization are safe and can lead to adequate weight loss. This technique allows the combination of an added restriction and malabsorption to the previous RYGB and could lead to an improved weight loss.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available