4.3 Review

Dietary Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) Significantly Reduces the Risk of Site-Specific Cancers: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Journal

NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL
Volume 73, Issue 5, Pages 721-739

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1771385

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences [IR.TBZMED.VCR.REC.1398.181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study indicates that higher intake of dietary Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC) is associated with reduced risk of different types of cancers in meta-analysis of observational studies.
Objectives:We aimed to evaluate the possible role of dietray TAC against different types of cancers in a systematic review and meta-analyses of observational studies.Methods:A literature search of authentic electronic resources had been performed to obtain the relevant studies up to February 2020.Results:Twenty-one studies including nine prospective and twelve case-control studies were included in the current systematic review and meta-analysis. These studies have included 1404297 individuals. Higher TAC categories were associated with 21% reduced risk of colorectal cancer, 27% reduced risk of endometrial cancer, 42% reduced risk of gastric cancer, and 32% reduced risk of pancreatic cancer. In meta-analysis of prospective studies also highest category of TAC was associated with reduced incidence of breast cancer (RR= 0.68; CI: 0.54, 0.86;P = 0.025), colon cancer (RR= 0.92; CI: 0.74, 1.16;P = 0.01), hepatocellular carcinoma (RR= 0.49; CI: 0.35, 0.69;P < 0.001), gastric cancer (RR= 0.65; CI: 0.50, 0.84;P = 0.001), lung cancer (RR= 0.90; CI: 0.85, 0.95;P = 0.001) while increased risk of rectal cancer (RR= 1.02; CI: 0.69, 1.52;P = 0.005).Conclusion:Higher intake of dietary TAC was in association with reduced risk of different types of cancers in meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available