4.3 Article

Using Objective Structured Clinical Examination as a Teaching Tool in a Hybrid Advanced Health Assessment Course

Journal

NURSE EDUCATOR
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 101-105

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000849

Keywords

differential diagnosis; doctor of nurse practice (DNP) program; nurse practitioner students; objective structured clinical examination (OSCE); online/hybrid education; physical assessment

Categories

Funding

  1. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) [D09HP29969]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The project found inconsistencies and deficiencies in DNP students' ability to make a differential diagnosis, indicating the need to explicitly teach APRN students differential diagnosis skills.
Background: Advanced health assessment is a required course in advanced practice RN (APRN) education, essential to providing the foundation for differential diagnosis (DD) skills and the ability to formulate a plan of care. Problem: Feedback from clinical preceptors revealed that our doctor of nursing practice (DNP) students struggled to make a DD. Approach: This educational quality improvement project collected data from 7 cohorts of DNP students in either the Family Nurse Practitioner or Adult Gerontology Nurse Practitioner program to evaluate their readiness for clinical practicums and to inform necessary curriculum revisions. Outcomes: Data revealed that students' ability to identify 3 DDs correctly during the summative health assessment objective structured clinical examination was inconsistent. Qualitative data revealed students lacked understanding on how to use results from the physical assessment to formulate a DD. Conclusion: The findings of this project corroborate those from the literature that suggest we should teach APRN students DD skills explicitly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available