4.8 Article

Atomic Charge Calculator II: web-based tool for the calculation of partial atomic charges

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 48, Issue W1, Pages W591-W596

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa367

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic: ELIXIR CZ [LM2018131]
  2. European Regional Development Fund - project ELIXIR-CZ [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 013/0001777]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic under the ELIXIR CZ research infrastructure project including access to computing and storage facilities [LM2018131]
  4. program Projects of Large Research, Development and Innovations Infrastructures [e-INFRA LM2018140]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Partial atomic charges serve as a simple model for the electrostatic distribution of a molecule that drives its interactions with its surroundings. Since partial atomic charges are frequently used in computational chemistry, chemoinformatics and bioinformatics, many computational approaches for calculating them have been introduced. The most applicable are fast and reasonably accurate empirical charge calculation approaches. Here, we introduce Atomic Charge Calculator II (ACC II), a web application that enables the calculation of partial atomic charges via all the main empirical approaches and for all types of molecules. ACC II implements 17 empirical charge calculation methods, including the highly cited (QEq, EEM), the recently published (EQeq, EQeq+C), and the old but still often used (PEOE). ACC II enables the fast calculation of charges even for large macromolecular structures. The web server also offers charge visualization, courtesy of the powerful LiteMol viewer. The calculation setup of ACC II is very straightforward and enables the quick calculation of high-quality partial charges. The application is available at https://acc2.ncbr.muni.cz.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available