4.4 Article

An isotope harvesting beam blocker for the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2020.163526

Keywords

Beam dump; FRIB; Hydrogen peroxide decomposition; Ion exchange; Isotope harvesting; NSCL

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy Of-fice of Science [DOE-FOA-0001588]
  2. U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration's Stewardship Science Graduate Fellowship program [DE-NA0003864]
  3. Michigan State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Harvesting isotopes from beam stops and other activated materials at accelerator facilities is a promising source of environmentally, scientifically and socially important radionuclides. At the Facility for Rare Isotope Beams (FRIB), a multitude of short- and long-lived radionuclides will be collected in a synergistic manner by dumping unused beams into a flowing-water beam stop. Ongoing exploratory research M the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory (NSCL) with an analogous beam blocker aims towards obtaining the necessary radiochemical expertise for this endeavor. Herein we present a beam blocker and an isotope harvesting system which allows collection of a wide variety of aqueous and gaseous radionuclides. The water which flows through the beam blocker functions as an isotope production target and concurrently transports the newly formed radionuclides to collection sites. The system includes analytical instruments for online measurements of conductivity, dissolved oxygen, temperature, pressure and for detection of radiolytic products. To limit the levels of radiolytically produced hydrogen peroxide, a stainless-steel based degradation system was designed and implemented. The suitability of the constructed system for the anticipated radionuclide harvesting project was demonstrated by offline tests and under irradiation with 140 MeV/u Ca-48(20+) ions at the NSCL Coupled Cyclotron Facility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available