4.5 Article

Γ-convergence of a mean-field model of a chiral doped nematic liquid crystal to the Oseen-Frank description of cholesterics

Journal

NONLINEARITY
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 3062-3102

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6544/ab74f5

Keywords

Oseen-Frank; cholesteric liquid crystals; helical twisting power; Gamma-convergence

Funding

  1. Basque Government through the BERC 2018-2021 program
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness MINECO through BCAM Severo Ochoa excellence [SEV-2017-0718]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness MINECO - AEI/FEDER, UE [MTM2017-82184-R]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Systems of elongated molecules, doped with small amounts of molecules lacking mirror symmetry can form macroscopically twisted cholesteric liquid crystal phases. The aim of this work is to rigorously derive the Oseen-Frank model of cholesterics from a more fundamental model concerned with pairwise molecular interactions. A non-local mean-field model of the two-species nematic host/chiral dopant mixture is proposed, and it is shown that Oseen-Frank's elastic free energy for cholesteric liquid crystals can be obtained in a simultaneously large-domain and dilute-dopant asymptotic regime. By techniques of -convergence, it is shown that in the asymptotic limit, dopant-dopant interactions are negligable, the Frank constants and nematic host order parameter are unperturbed by the presence of dopant, but the mirror asymmetry of the dopant-host interaction leads to a macroscopically twisted ground state. The constant of proportionality between the helical wavenumber and dopant concentration, the helical twisting power (HTP), can be explicitly found through such an analysis, with a nonlinear temperature dependence. Depending on the relative strengths of the host-host and host-dopant interactions, it is shown that HTP may increase or decrease with temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available